top of page

Step 3: Restoring Conditions for Natural Succession

Restoring the pathways that allow the mangrove system to function again

By Step 3, you already understand the site’s history, ecological symptoms, and hydrological patterns. Now you begin to answer the most important question in ecological mangrove restoration:

​

What, exactly, is preventing natural regeneration?

This step focuses on identifying the physical, hydrological, and ecological modifications that are blocking natural secondary succession — and determining what needs to be restored so the ecosystem has a fair chance to heal itself.

​

Restoration begins by restoring conditions, not by planting. Mangroves are resilient, and when the foundational conditions are repaired, they often return on their own with surprising speed.

Westerhall 22.JPG

© Reginald Joseph

Identify the Modifications Blocking Recovery

Walk the site again with the information from Steps 1 and 2 in hand.
You are looking for modifications of the original mangrove environment — anything that disrupted tidal exchange, freshwater inputs, sediment movement, or propagule access.

​

Common examples include:

  • small berms left by road or house construction

  • filled areas that altered tidal reach

  • blocked or narrowed channels

  • storm-deposited ridges preventing water exchange

  • culverts that restrict incoming tide height

  • heavily compacted areas where propagules cannot settle

  • dredging scars or abandoned drainage cuts

 

These changes may seem minor, but even a subtle elevation increase can shift the entire hydrological rhythm of the basin.

​

At this stage, your goal is diagnostic clarity:
What changed?
Where did it change?


How did that change disrupt the natural system?

Determine What Conditions Must Be Restored

To support natural succession, the following conditions usually need to be restored:

  1. Tidal Access.Mangroves rely on the regular rise and fall of the tide. Any obstruction — even a shallow ridge — can cut off the tidal signal.

  2. Hydrological Connectivity. Channels must allow water to move in and out. Restoring connectivity does not mean digging new channels; it means reopening or clearing existing ones.

  3. Sediment Suitability. If sediments are permanently stagnant or overly compacted, roots will not establish. Restoring drainage and flushing usually improves sediment naturally.

  4. Access for Propagules. If propagules cannot reach the site due to a berm, filled area, or blocked channel, natural regeneration stalls.

  5. Water Chemistry Conditions. Extremes in salinity or persistent anoxia often reflect blocked water movement. Fix hydrology first; chemistry usually corrects itself.

 

You do not intervene yet — Step 3 is about identifying what must be repaired, not performing the repair.

Decide Where Restoration Should Be Minimized

EMR encourages restoring only the conditions that need it and leaving the rest untouched.

Look for areas where:

  • hydrology is still functioning;

  • vegetation is recovering;

  • seedlings appear naturally;

  • sensitive wildlife or habitat features occur;

  • interventions could cause more harm than good.

 

Restoration should be strategic and minimal, not broad or heavy-handed.

Cultural Heritage Compliance

Some mangroves and coastal wetlands in Grenada overlap with archaeological landscapes.
Before proposing any hydrological repair (e.g., lowering berms, reopening historical channels, removing fill), you must determine whether the area contains known or likely cultural deposits.

  1. Check the “Explore the Map” Page. The map includes an overlay of known and probable archaeological zones. If your site intersects one of these areas, treat it as sensitive.

  2. If the site appears culturally significant, consult with the national heritage contact: Dr. Jonathan Hanna, Grenada Archaeology Network, jhanna+web.info@grenadaarchaeology.com He can advise whether: cultural materials exist at the site; the proposed intervention is low risk; the restoration plan needs modification or rerouting.

  3. If you encounter artifacts during assessment. Stop immediately.

 

Do not remove or rebury the material.
Photograph, record location, and contact Dr. Hanna.

Ground disturbance should not proceed until heritage clearance is complete

Produce a Clear Restoration Plan

Step 3 concludes with a written plan outlining:

  • the specific modifications blocking natural recovery;

  • the conditions that must be restored;

  • areas where intervention should be avoided;

  • areas where only minimal hydrological correction is needed;

  • cultural-heritage constraints;

  • the expected ecological response.

This plan becomes the blueprint for Step 4, where natural regeneration is monitored once the site is corrected.

bottom of page